SC affirms suspension of Alabang Boys' lawyer

February 22, 2016 10:54 am 

MANILA, Feb. 21 — The Supreme Court (SC) has affirmed its ruling suspending a lawyer from the practice of law for six months stemming from the case of the so-called "Alabang Boys."

In an en banc ruling, the SC denied the motion for reconsideration (MR) filed by Atty. Felisberto Verano Jr.

The SC partially granted the manifestation with omnibus motion, motion to lift suspension and urgent motion to resolve the same.

The case arose from the complaint filed by Dante Jimenez and the late Lauro Vizconde of the Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption (VACC).

By his own admission, Verano drafted the release order for his clients Richard Brodett and Joseph Tecson, better known as the "Alabang Boys," and gave it to then Department of Justice (DOJ) Secretary Raul Gonzalez for his approval and signature.

The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Commission on Bar Discipline found this practice of "feeding" a draft order to the DOJ Secretary to be highly irregular as it tended to influence a public official in the performance of official duties until the case was elevated to the SC.

In July 2014, the SC found Verano guilty of violating the Rules 1.02 and 15.7 in relation to Canon 13 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, for which he was suspended from the practice of law for six months.

This prompted Verano to file his MR before the SC.

At the outset, Verano expressed his sincerest apologies and deepest regrets for his actions adjudged to be conduct unbecoming an officer of the court.

Verano asserted that his only fault is that he got "too carried away" by his dedication to his profession and to the cause of his clients.

However, the SC denied his MR, saying that his "argument that the IBP resolution has already attained finality was rendered unavailing by the amendment of Rule 139-B of the Rules of Court."

"Respondent's reinstatement as a member of the Bar shall be effective upon his compliance with the guidelines set forth in Maniago vs. De Dios case," the SC ruling said.

In Maniago case, the SC provides that a suspended lawyer shall file a sworn statement with the court, through the Office of the Bar Confidant (OBC), stating that he or she has desisted from the practice of law and has not appeared in any court during the period of his or her suspension.

"Any finding or report contrary to the statements made by the lawyer under oath shall be a ground for the imposition of a more severe punishment, or disbarment, as may be warranted," the SC ruling said.

The SC en banc ruling was promulgated on Nov. 24, 2015 and was released last Friday. (PNA)



Comments are closed.